Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 24;33(3):381–407. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9408-y

Table 4.

Model 2: Multinomial regression predicting the effects of employment uncertainty, controlling for socio-demographic variables, on fertility intentions and fertility intention–realization among the low- and medium-education groups; beta coefficients

Intended parents Stable yes Abandoners Postponers
B Sig. B Sig. B Sig. B Sig.
Explanatory variables
 Male employment uncertainty (ref. stability)
  Decline −0.763 0.136 −0.112 0.797 0.301 0.644 −0.601 0.284
  Rise −0.540 0.261 −0.586 0.219 0.201 0.757 −0.530 0.335
 Female employment uncertainty (ref. stability)
  Decline 0.263 0.522 0.348 0.395 0.752 0.155 −0.295 0.657
  Rise 0.136 0.713 −0.690 0.133 −0.185 0.753 −0.178 0.737
Control variables
 Age −0.155 0.000 −0.141 0.000 −0.103 0.013 −0.142 0.000
 Parity (ref. 2 or more children)
  0 child 1.628 0.000 2.446 0.000 0.230 0.711 1.557 0.003
  1 child 2.344 0.000 3.028 0.000 1.536 0.005 1.312 0.038
 Income CHF (log)
  Individual −0.053 0.857 0.206 0.550 0.943 0.059 0.032 0.938
  Household 0.105 0.824 0.287 0.572 −1.380 0.037 −0.061 0.916
  Sex (ref. women) 0.651 0.124 0.386 0.365 −0.854 0.193 1.060 0.041
 Year of the first interview (ref. 2002–2003)
  2004–2006 −0.244 0.4830 −0.534 0.137 0.502 0.391 0.055 0.902
  2007–2009 0.331 0.389 0.286 0.452 1.559 0.007 0.467 0.349
  Constant 1.116 0.804 −4.652 0.345 5.356 0.397 1.060 0.041

The reference group is the stable no group. R 2 = 0.351 (Nagelkerke). Model X 2 (48) = 256.285, p ≤ 0.001