Skip to main content
. 2005 Feb 16;33(3):922–933. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki187

Table 4.

Improvement of reported W8 method over previous methods

%HGT W8 vs CG (%) W8 vs 3/4 (%) W8 vs CODONS (%) W8 vs CAI (%)
(A) % improvement in overall performance
1 12.47 14.48 23.60 7.45
2 11.85 13.18 21.85 6.68
4 10.88 11.87 19.62 5.91
8 9.47 9.64 16.09 4.77
(B) % average relative improvement
1 146.57 93.01 232.79 41.61
2 70.57 59.82 129.98 27.87
4 32.90 37.24 78.96 18.18
8 19.88 22.04 45.05 11.64