Skip to main content
. 2005 Feb 7;33(3):816–824. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki233

Table 4.

The column (CS) and sum-of-pair (Q) scores of the BAliBASE test cases in references 1–5

Method REF 1 (82) (%) P REF 2 (23) (%) P REF 3 (12) (%) P REF 4 (12) (%) P REF 5 (12) (%) P Weighted average (%) P
Column scores (CS)
    PRALINEBASIC 76.9 0.425 51.0 0.593 54.0 0.786 38.5 0.991 59.8 0.786 66.0 0.187
    PRALINEPREPRO 78.4 0.425 56.2 0.842 50.8 0.786 30.7 0.991 77.1 0.786 68.3 0.949
    PRALINEPSI 83.9 61.0 55.8 53.9 68.6 73.9
    T-COFFEEv2.03 78.9 0.548 58.5 0.593 54.8 0.786 70.8 0.186 86.1 0.186 73.4 0.768
    MUSCLEv3.51 79.9 0.914 60.2 0.842 58.3 0.786 63.3 0.186 91.4 0.066 74.4 0.858
Sum-of-pairs scores (Q)
    PRALINEBASIC 85.0 0.319 91.0 0.017 77.1 0.991 73.2 0.991 82.5 0.786 84.1 0.030
    PRALINEPREPRO 86.0 0.425 93.1 0.593 77.9 0.991 74.1 0.991 88.9 0.991 85.7 0.858
    PRALINEPSI 90.4 94.0 76.4 79.9 81.8 88.2
    T-COFFEEv2.03 86.2 0.425 93.9 0.842 76.7 0.786 88.3 0.433 94.6 0.186 87.5 0.858
    MUSCLEv3.51 87.0 0.914 93.7 0.842 79.6 0.433 88.9 0.186 97.8 0.019 88.5 0.928

The scores are listed separately for each reference set and the overall average, weighted relative to the number of alignments in each reference set (numbers in parentheses are the number of alignments each set contains). The ‘P’ columns show the statistical significance (P-value from Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) of the results of each method compared with PRALINEPSI. P-values below 0.05 are underlined.