Table 1.
Comparison of the Van Blitterswijk et al., and Gallagher et al., studies
study | SNP | minor allele | Ref. allele | model | Reported OR/Beta |
OR/Beta Minor Allele |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk for disease | ||||||
Gallagher | rs1990622 | C | T | Allelic | 1.56 (table 3) |
0.64 (minor allele carriers>lower risk) |
Van Blitterswijk | rs3173615 | G | G | Recessive | 0.33 (table 1) |
0.33 |
Age at onset | ||||||
Gallagher | rs1990622 | C | T | Additive | +3.47 (table 2) |
−3.47 (minor allele carriers>earlier onset) |
Gallagher | rs1990622 | C | T | Dominant respect major allele* | – | – |
Van Blitterswijk | rs3173615 | G | G | Recessive respect minor allele* | −1.26 (table 3) |
−1.26 (minor allele carriers>earlier onset) |
Ref. Allele= reference allele.
OR= Odds ratio
please note that a genetic dominant model (MM+Mm vs. mm) respect to the major allele is the same as a recessive model respect to the minor allele (MM+Mm vs. mm). “M” denotes major allele and “m” minor allele