Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;14(1):313–321. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6145

Table II.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for factors associated with mortality in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients.

A, Stage I (n=75)

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Characteristics Comparison HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Age, years <65 vs. ≥65 0.93 0.37–2.30 0.87 0.96 0.33–2.79 0.94
Sex Female vs. male 0.95 0.39–2.34 0.91 1.94 0.60–6.22 0.27
Tobacco smoking No vs. yes 0.57 0.23–1.42 0.23 0.49 0.15–1.56 0.23
Grade G1 vs. G2+G3 1.59 0.57–4.43 0.37 1.41 0.41–4.83 0.59
T stage T1 vs. T2-T4 1.29 0.51–3.28 0.59 1.44 0.46–4.53 0.53
UFT No vs. yes 1.19 0.46–3.08 0.72 1.00 0.36–2.81 1.00
EGFR expression EGFR vs. EGFR+ 2.98 1.21–7.36 0.02 2.64 0.88–7.92 0.08
ABCB1 status ABCB1 vs. ABCB1+ 3.11 1.08–8.97 0.04 2.53 0.76–8.47 0.13

B, EGFR wild-type (n=56)

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Characteristics Comparison HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value

Age, years <65 vs. ≥65 5.50 0.69–43.14 0.11 4.73 0.55–40.71 0.16
Sex Female vs. male 1.27 0.33–4.91 0.73 1.91 0.36–10.16 0.45
Tobacco smoking No vs. yes 1.56 0.33–7.33 0.58 1.30 0.18–9.29 0.80
Grade G1 vs. G2+G3 1.27 0.33–4.92 0.73 0.54 0.12–2.47 0.42
T stage T1 vs. T2-T4 5.86 0.74–46.42 0.09 6.82 0.67–69.08 0.10
UFT No vs. yes 0.57 0.15–2.20 0.42 0.26 0.06–1.09 0.07
ABCB1 status ABCB1 vs. ABCB1+ 3.92 0.92–16.78 0.07 3.58 0.70–18.41 0.13

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ABCB1, ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1; UFT, uracil-tegafur.