Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;14(1):313–321. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6145

Table III.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for factors associated with disease-free survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients.

A, Stage I (n=75)

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Characteristics Comparison HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Age, years <65 vs. ≥65 1.87 0.74–4.74 0.19 1.94 0.70–5.38 0.20
Sex Female vs. male 1.97 0.81–4.80 0.13 2.47 0.78–7.88 0.13
Tobacco smoking No vs. yes 1.62 0.60–4.38 0.34 1.49 0.44–5.06 0.52
Grade G1 vs. G2+G3 1.36 0.54–3.47 0.51 0.75 0.27–2.07 0.57
T stage T1 vs. T2-T4 2.70 1.00–7.28 0.05 2.08 0.62–7.01 0.24
UFT No vs. yes 2.54 1.06–6.08 0.04 2.22 0.85–5.77 0.10
EGFR expression EGFR vs. EGFR+ 1.17 0.46–2.96 0.75 2.03 0.63–6.46 0.23
ABCB1 status ABCB1 vs. ABCB1+ 2.16 0.85–5.53 0.11 1.47 0.51–4.25 0.47

B, EGFR wild-type (n=56)

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Characteristics Comparison HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value

Age, years <65 vs. ≥65 4.71 1.07–20.64 0.04 4.31 0.96–19.40 0.06
Sex Female vs. male 2.66 0.76–9.27 0.12 1.91 0.44–8.31 0.39
Tobacco smoking No vs. yes 3.30 0.75–14.45 0.11 2.30 0.39–13.61 0.36
Grade G1 vs. G2+G3 1.23 0.43–3.52 0.69 0.51 0.15–1.77 0.29
T stage T1 vs. T2-T4 3.08 0.88–10.73 0.08 2.36 0.49–11.35 0.29
UFT No vs. yes 1.58 0.61–4.10 0.35 0.84 0.29–2.47 0.75
ABCB1 status ABCB1 vs. ABCB1+ 4.29 1.54–11.92 0.01 3.49 1.03–11.89 0.05

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ABCB1, ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1; UFT, uracil-tegafur.