Table 2.
Comparison of lobular %GM density
| ET w/HJT vs. Controls | ET w/VT vs. Controls | |
|---|---|---|
| n = 27 vs n = 36 | n = 22 vs n = 36 | |
| Left_I-IV | (p = 0.018) | (p = 0.025) |
| Left_V | (p = 0.004) | (p = 0.005) |
| Left_VIIb | (p = 0.013) | |
| Left_VIIIa | (p = 0.009) | |
| Left_IX | (p = 0.010) | (p = 0.005) |
| Left_X | (p = 0.014) | (p = 0.008) |
| Right_V | (p = 0.021) | (p = 0.026) |
| Right_IX | (p = 0.001) | (p = 0.001) |
| Vermis_CrusI | (p = 0.016) | |
| Vermis_CrusII | (p = 0.012) | |
| Vermis_VI | (p = 0.019) | |
| Vermis_VIIb | (p = 0.011) | (p = 0.004) |
| Vermis_VIIIb | (p = 0.026) |
Regions of significance are shown (p < 0.05) that met the BH FDR criterion. Abbreviations [HJT Head/Jaw Tremor (i.e., presence of head or jaw tremor on examination), VT Voice Tremor (i.e., presence of voice tremor on examination)]. In these comparisons, age, gender, MOCA score and group were incorporated as continuous and discrete independent variables and regressed against the regional %GM density of the 34 cerebellar regions