Skip to main content
. 2017 May 11;14(1):165–170. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6154

Table III.

Correlation coefficients and P-values for patient data and nutritional assessment techniques according to sex.

PG-SGA NRS-2002


Men Women Men Women


Nutritional parameters Correlation P-value Correlation P-value Correlation P-value Correlation P-value
Weight, kg −0.296 <0.001 −0.350 <0.001 −0.341 <0.001 −0.418 <0.001
BMI, kg/m2 −0.305 <0.001 −0.355 <0.001 −0.336 <0.001 −0.417 <0.001
TSF, mm −0.224 <0.001 −0.343 <0.001 −0.207 <0.001 −0.332 <0.001
MAC, cm −0.294 <0.001 −0.417 <0.001 −0.266 <0.001 −0.395 <0.001
MAMC, cm −0.237 <0.001 −0.321 <0.001 −0.222 <0.001 −0.295 <0.001
Non-dominant hand grip, kg −0.333 <0.001 −0.219 <0.001 −0.324 <0.001 −0.239 <0.001
Total protein, g/l −0.323 <0.001 −0.333 <0.001 −0.319 <0.001 −0.313 <0.001
Albumin, g/l −0.271 <0.001 −0.376 <0.001 −0.297 <0.001 −0.264 <0.001
Hemoglobin, mg/l −0.214 <0.001 −0.165 0.001 −0.266 <0.001 −0.255 0.001
NRS-2002 score 0.543 <0.001 0.575 <0.001

All P-values were determined with the use of Spearmans correlation coefficient. PG-SGA, patient-generated subjective global assessment; NRS-2002, nutritional risk screening; BMI, body mass index; TSF, triceps skinfold thickness; MAC, mid-arm circumference; MAMC, mid-arm muscle circumference.