Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Labour Econ. 2016 May 21;41:194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.05.014

Table 3.

Differences in Socio-Economic Characteristics by Incidence of Layoff and Business Closed Since First Interview

Ever had layoff Ever had business closed
No Yes T-test No Yes T-test
Age 63.81 64.45 3.975 63.84 64.57 3.679
Male 0.521 0.511 −0.415 0.522 0.492 −1.002
High school 0.606 0.550 −2.389 0.592 0.657 2.194
College 0.291 0.294 0.110 0.303 0.180 −4.469
Black 0.084 0.059 −1.866 0.080 0.084 0.283
Hispanic 0.062 0.071 0.747 0.060 0.103 2.912
Mother worked 0.547 0.603 1.825 0.544 0.668 3.203
# inf. in child 1.401 1.301 −1.561 1.387 1.375 −0.152
Child health v.good 0.825 0.833 0.308 0.829 0.803 −0.912
# health cond. 0.302 0.284 −0.517 0.303 0.262 −0.942
1+ parent smoke 0.711 0.737 0.915 0.714 0.723 0.263
# of marriage 1.378 1.419 1.178 1.375 1.477 2.333
# of children 2.460 2.465 0.067 2.455 2.516 0.658
Age first child 24.67 24.75 0.31 24.78 23.73 −3.41
Mother education 10.51 10.59 0.467 10.57 10.097 −2.088
Father education 10.063 10.291 1.159 10.152 9.522 −2.511
Primary industry 0.075 0.102 2.091 0.079 0.075 −0.221
Secondary industry 0.304 0.339 1.536 0.300 0.401 3.494
Tertiary industry 0.621 0.558 −2.614 0.620 0.523 −3.190
Manual occupation 0.268 0.250 −0.825 0.259 0.334 2.725

Sample weights used. The sample is restricted to respondents who are employed at the first observation. In the sample, when restricting to those with non-missing information, we have 2,572 observations with 434 layoff and 248 business closed