Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Labour Econ. 2016 May 21;41:194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.05.014

Table 8.

Matching Estimates of the Effect of Job Loss on Health Care Use

Layoff Bussiness closure
Regulary take drugs 0.0175 (0.0222) −0.0127 (0.0298)
Doctors visits 1.0482 (0.6546) 0.6272 (0.7349)
6+ Doctors visits 0.0114 (0.0324) 0.0335 (0.0390)
Num. night hosp 0.4506 (0.3545) 1.1279 (0.9206)
1+ night hosp 0.0368 (0.0255) 0.0022 (0.0340)

Observation (control + treated) 1000 636
***

p < 0.01,

**

p < 0.05,

*

p < 0.1.

Estimation using the nearest-neighbor matching estimator (NNM) with one neighbour by treated observation. The average of the difference between the observed and matched observation along with standard errors ( in parenthesis) is reported.

The match is done exactly by wave, and by the nearest-neighbor on a propensity score. The propensity score is obtained using a logit regression with the same set of variables as those used in Table 4 and in which we add variable health condition. Finally we add the health variables directly to the NNM matching set to obtain a better match on these variables. The sample is restricted to respondents who are employed at the current wave.