Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 Mar 22;35(9):2040–2050. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2544958

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison on susceptibility maps reconstructed by TKD (a), MEDI (b), HEDI (c) and SFCR (d) of the simulation data of two slices and their error maps with zoomed views in blue rectangles. The error maps of MEDI and HEDI present obvious residual structures, while there is no noticeable error in SFCR results. (e-f) susceptibility profiles of line 1 and line 2 with • denoting the starting point, where arrows indicate profile differences of MEDI and HEDI.