Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180031

Table 2. Levels of evidence synthesis for methodological quality of paper and consistency of clinimetric evidence of measurement property.a.

Level Rating Criteria
Strong evidence +++ or—- Consistent findings in multiple studies of good methodological quality OR in one study of excellent methodological quality
Moderate evidence ++ or — Consistent findings in multiple studies of fair methodological quality OR in one study of good methodological quality
Limited evidence + or - One study of fair methodological quality
Conflicting evidence ± Conflicting findings
Unknown evidence ? Only studies of poor methodological quality

+ = positive rating,— = negative rating, ± = conflicting rating,? = indeterminate rating

aAdapted from Terwee et al., [7] Dobson et al. [31] and Dekkers et al. [20]