Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180031

Table 7. Levels of evidencea of lower limb strength measurements based on Brink and Louwb methodological quality.

Neurological test or method Diagnosis Measurement property
Intra-rater reliability Inter-rater reliability Validity Responsiveness
ASIA Impairment Scale SCI ± Conflicting [57] No evidence No evidence No evidence
CMTPedS CMT No evidence ++ Moderate [45] No evidence No evidence
HHD CP ± Conflictingc [46, 47, 51, 52, 54] ± Conflicting [53] No evidence No evidence
SB + Limited [48] ++ Moderate [49] No evidence No evidence
DMD ++ Moderate [50] No evidence No evidence No evidence
MMT SB No evidence ± Conflicting [49] No evidence No evidence
DMD ± Conflicting [55,56] ? Unknown [55] No evidence No evidence
RQMS CP No evidence ? Unknown [55] No evidence No evidence
SHR CP ++ Moderate [52] No evidence No evidence No evidence

CMTPedS, Charcot- Marie- Tooth Paediatric Scale; HHD, Hand held dynamometer; MMT, Manual muscle test; RQMS, Richmond Quantitative Measurement System; SHR, Standing heel rise; +++ or— = strong evidence with consistent findings from two or more good quality papers or one paper of excellent quality; ++ or— = moderate evidence with consistent findings from two or more fair quality papers or one paper of good quality; + or— = limited evidence with consistent findings from one paper of fair quality, ± = conflicting evidence with inconsistent findings from one or more papers of fair quality,? = unknown evidence with findings only from papers of poor quality, 0 = no evidence.

aAdapted from Terwee et al., [7] Dobson et al. [31] and Dekkers et al. [20]

bMethodological quality based on Brink and Louw et al.’s [6] critical appraisal tool using an arbitrary grades based on the percentage of “yes” responses for applicable items. Arbitrary grades: <40% = Poor, 40%-59% = Fair, 60% - 79% = Good, >80% = Excellent.

cBoth Taylor et al. [51] and Van Vulpen et al. [52] report “test-retest reliability”, however their measurement characteristics (S4 Table) fit the definition of intra-rater reliability defined as defined in Table 1.