Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 12;114(26):6734–6739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617711114

Table S2.

Study 1 multinomial regression results with Hillary Clinton as the base outcome

Vote for Donald Trump Vote for neither
Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Constant 5.315*** 4.281*** 4.136*** 3.153***
(0.867) (0.97) (0.708) (0.792)
Controls
 Gender, −0.524* −0.501* −0.302 −0.284
(0.256) (0.26) (0.199) (0.201)
 Age 0.019 0.018 −0.006 −0.006
(0.012) (0.012) (0.01) (0.01)
 Income −0.09 −0.057 −0.180** −0.151*
(0.081) (0.083) (0.068) (0.069)
 Duration living in the zip code −0.038 −0.037 −0.117 −0.117
(0.106) (0.107) (0.079) (0.08)
 Liberal −1.214*** −1.215*** −0.629*** −0.629***
(0.093) (0.093) (0.07) (0.07)
Total population§ −0.000 −0.000 −0.000 −0.000
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
 Population density§ 0.006 −0.02 0.082 0.058
(0.139) (0.141) (0.109) (0.11)
 No. of zips in the county§ −0.000 0.000 −0.002 −0.001
(0.003) (0.003) (0.002) (0.002)
Independent variable
 Economic uncertainty§ 4.51* 4.27**
(1.96) (1.60)
N 750 750 750 750
Adjusted R2 0.222 0.227 0.222 0.227

P values: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. SEs are shown in parentheses.

Measures self-reported by participants.

Categorical variable (1 = male, 2 = female).

§

Measures obtained from the external economic database.