Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jan;45(1):48–61. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0763-0

Table 4.

Professional, practice, and attitudinal predictors of standardized progress measure administration

Use (any regular administration of standardized progress measures) Frequent use (administers standardized progress measures at least once a month)


Univariate MV Univariate MV




B Odds ratio B Odds ratio B Odds ratio B Odds ratio
Professional/practice characteristics
Years professional experiencea −0.35*** 0.71 −0.34** 0.71 −0.32 0.73 −0.36 0.70
CBT orientation 0.38 1.46 0.045 1.05 −0.04 0.96 −0.71 0.49
Psychodynamic orientation −0.65 0.52 −0.063 0.94 −0.88 0.41 −0.41 0.67
Doctoral versus master’s degree −0.002 1.00 −0.55 0.58 −0.089 0.92 −0.52 0.60
Private practice versus other settings −0.98*** 0.38 −0.63 0.53 −0.87** 0.42 −0.76 0.47
Workplace dictates 0.98*** 2.65 0.62** 1.85 0.83** 2.30 0.42 1.51
Child work 0.25 1.28 −0.033 0.97 0.17 1.18 0.026 1.03
Attitudes
MFA benefit 0.82*** 2.27 0.30 1.35 0.43 1.54 −0.56 0.57
MFA harm −0.37** 0.69 0.13 1.14 0.014 1.02 0.76** 2.13
ASA-MF clinical utility 1.14*** 3.12 0.44 1.55 1.45*** 4.26 0.37 1.45
ASA-MF treatment planning 1.04*** 2.81 0.36 1.43 1.27*** 3.57 0.77 2.16
ASA-MF practicality 0.95*** 2.57 0.52 1.68 1.4*** 4.08 1.51*** 4.54

MV Multivariate analysis-all predictors were examined simultaneously via multiple logistic regression, CBT cognitive-behavioral therapy

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001

a

Years of professional experience was standardized