Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 24;54(7):1901–1909. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2623-7

Table 2.

Cooking loss and water holding capacity (WHC) of the sausages as affected by partial replacement of porcine fat with SBO in alternative forms at various oil substitution levels

Sample SBO substitution level (%) Cooking loss (%) WHC (%)
Control 12.85 ± 0.85B 92.10 ± 0.33A
NSBO 25 12.47 ± 0.21Bc 92.07 ± 0.15Ba
35 13.87 ± 0.24Bb 91.21 ± 0.7SBab
45 14.34 ± 0.51Ba 90.2S ± 0.53Bb
FPI-preSBO 25 9.00 ± 0.28Cb 91.45 ± 0.29Ba
35 9.00 ± 0.52Cb 90.85 ± 0.34Ba
45 9.99 ± 0.14Ca 90.46 ± 1.06Bab
Nc-preSBO 25 16.55 ± 0.55Ac 91.32 ± 0.30Ba
35 19.41 ± 1.18Ab 90.71 ± 0.53Ba
45 22.75 ± 0.43Aa 90.12 ± 0.84Bab

Control, the sausages without SBO; NSBO, the sausages with SBO in its native form; FPI-preSBO, the sausages with FPI stabilized preSBO; Ne-preSBO, the sausages with Nc stabilized preSBO

Within one column, different capital letters indicate that tire form of SBO caused a significant difference in means (P < 0.05), and different small letters indicate a significant effect of substitution level within one form of SBO (P < 0.05)