Table 2.
Sample | SBO substitution level (%) | Cooking loss (%) | WHC (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Control | – | 12.85 ± 0.85B | 92.10 ± 0.33A |
NSBO | 25 | 12.47 ± 0.21Bc | 92.07 ± 0.15Ba |
35 | 13.87 ± 0.24Bb | 91.21 ± 0.7SBab | |
45 | 14.34 ± 0.51Ba | 90.2S ± 0.53Bb | |
FPI-preSBO | 25 | 9.00 ± 0.28Cb | 91.45 ± 0.29Ba |
35 | 9.00 ± 0.52Cb | 90.85 ± 0.34Ba | |
45 | 9.99 ± 0.14Ca | 90.46 ± 1.06Bab | |
Nc-preSBO | 25 | 16.55 ± 0.55Ac | 91.32 ± 0.30Ba |
35 | 19.41 ± 1.18Ab | 90.71 ± 0.53Ba | |
45 | 22.75 ± 0.43Aa | 90.12 ± 0.84Bab |
Control, the sausages without SBO; NSBO, the sausages with SBO in its native form; FPI-preSBO, the sausages with FPI stabilized preSBO; Ne-preSBO, the sausages with Nc stabilized preSBO
Within one column, different capital letters indicate that tire form of SBO caused a significant difference in means (P < 0.05), and different small letters indicate a significant effect of substitution level within one form of SBO (P < 0.05)