Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 19;4(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.7161

Table 2.

Mean system usability scale (SUS) score and midpoint comparison.

SUSa item Midpoint 3D-MAPb, mean (SD) Gap score Dfc t test values P value
(2-tail)
S1: I think that I would like to use this 3D-MAP application frequently. 3.00 3.42 (1.062) 0.42 32 2.30 .03d
S2: I found the 3D-MAP application unnecessarily complex.e 3.00 4.09 (0.879) 1.09 32 7.13 <.001d
S3: I thought the 3D-MAP application was easy to use. 3.00 3.88 (1.083) 0.88 32 4.66 <.001d
S4: I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this 3D-MAP application.e 3.00 3.91 (1.234) 0.91 32 4.23 <.001d
S5: I found the various functions in this 3D-MAP application were well integrated. 3.00 3.94 (0.933) 0.94 32 5.78 <.001d
S6: I thought there was too much inconsistency in this 3D-MAP application.e 3.00 4.19 (0.873) 1.19 32 7.62 <.001d
S7: I would imagine that most people would learn to use this 3D-MAP application very quickly. 3.00 3.94 (1.435) 0.94 32 3.76 .001d
S8: I found the 3D-MAP application very awkward to use.e 3.00 4.26 (0.682) 1.26 32 10.28 <.001d
S9: I felt very confident using the 3D-MAP app. 3.00 3.82 (1.211) 0.82 32 3.88 <.001d
S10: I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this 3D-MAP application.e 3.00 4.39 (0.747) 1.39 32 10.71 <.001d

aSUS: system usability scale.

b3D-MAP: 3D measurement aid prototype.

cDf: degrees of freedom.

dIndicates statistically significant ≥.05 confidence level.

eResponses of negative items were reversed to align with positive items, higher scores indicate positive responses.