Skip to main content
. 2017 May 29;58(7):1338–1353. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M074229

TABLE 1.

Eicosanoids levels in cardiac tissue measured by LC/MS/MS

Saline Ang II
WT αMHC-CYP2J2-Tr WT αMHC-CYP2J2-Tr
AA-CYP epoxygenase
 5,6-EET 51.90 ± 2.33 172.20 ± 6.13a 39.78 ± 2.00a 160.93 ± 3.87a,b
 8,9-EET 62.61 ± 2.54 247.40 ± 4.48a 50.34 ± 3.25a 235.53 ± 5.40a,b
 11,12-EET 80.69 ± 4.51 248.81 ± 5.75a 67.79 ± 3.75a 244.57 ± 2.13a,b
 14,15-EET 142.54 ± 5.32 360.52 ± 6.55a 127.50 ± 4.73a 344.88 ± 2.10a,b
 5,6-DHET 0.78 ± 0.07 1.41 ± 0.08a 0.53 ± 0.03a 1.17 ± 0.08a,b
 8,9-DHET 1.70 ± 0.06 6.01 ± 0.10a 1.52 ± 0.05 5.55 ± 0.13a,b
 11,12-DHET 2.65 ± 0.04 6.38 ± 0.18a 2.55 ± 0.03 5.95 ± 0.23a,b
 14,15-DHET 2.58 ± 0.16 6.99 ± 0.18a 2.04 ± 0.10a 7.20 ± 0.13a,b
LA-CYP epoxygenase
 12,13-EpOME 80.03 ± 2.73 82.08 ± 3.28 76.76 ± 2.41 79.30 ± 3.51
 9,10-EpOME 98.24 ± 2.07 95.00 ± 3.43 102.42 ± 2.55 96.12 ± 2.98
 12,13-diHOME 46.81 ± 2.49 50.42 ± 2.84 51.22 ± 3.28 53.27 ± 2.46
 9,10-diHOME 31.22 ± 2.25 36.26 ± 3.20 35.13 ± 3.04 34.65 ± 3.53
AA-CYP allylic-oxidase
 9-HETE 148.75 ± 3.82 150.73 ± 3.56 187.66 ± 1.17a 192.27 ± 1.91a
 11-HETE 105.75 ± 2.10 110.29 ± 2.10 143.18 ± 3.78a 148.46 ± 5.02a
AA-LOX
 15-HETE 154.15 ± 1.20 155.96 ± 1.24 197.26 ± 1.87a 201.49 ± 2.24a
 5-HETE 188.28 ± 1.22 190.48 ± 1.04 237.41 ± 2.71a 242.65 ± 2.65a
 8-HETE 64.10 ± 1.51 65.20 ± 1.14 85.08 ± 1.55a 84.23 ± 1.32a
AA-CYP ω-hydrolase
 16-HETE 4.55 ± 0.12 4.77 ± 0.13 4.95 ± 0.10 5.00 ± 0.22
 17-HETE 1.48 ± 0.07 1.39 ± 0.08 1.59 ± 0.07 1.22 ± 0.05
 18-HETE 1.56 ± 0.08 1.78 ± 0.09 1.70 ± 0.10 1.68 ± 0.09
 19-HETE 1.77 ± 0.05 1.93 ± 0.13 2.01 ± 0.06 1.82 ± 0.03
 20-HETE 0.48 ± 0.05 0.61 ± 0.06 1.63 ± 0.05a 1.53 ± 0.03a

Eicosanoid levels are in picograms per milligram. LC/MS/MS results revealed that EETs and DHETs in cardiac tissue were increased in αMHC-CYP2J2-Tr mice under both saline- and Ang II-infused condition (n = 5 for each group). LA, linoleic acid; EpOME, epoxy-12Z-octadecenoic acid; diHOME, dihydroxyoctadecenoic acid.

a

P < 0.05 versus WT-saline.

b

P < 0.05 versus WT-Ang II.