Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;4:25. doi: 10.1186/s40608-017-0160-6

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI)* for association 1 between the MetS and 2 its components with sUA

Variables Odds ratio 95% CI p-value
Metabolic syndrome n = 59 Age (yr) 0.620 [0.302, 1.273] 0.193
Uric Acid (mg/dL) 3.942 [1.589, 9.775] 0.003
Gender 0.208 [0.048, 0.901] 0.208
BMI (kg/m2) 1.113 [0.949, 1.304] 0.187
Abdominal obesity (waist circumference > 90th percentile) n = 53 Age (yr) 0.677 [0.328, 1.397] 0.291
Uric Acid (mg/dL) 3.854 [1.518, 9.787] 0.005
Gender 0.212 [0.048, 0.930] 0.040
BMI (kg/m2) 1.074 [0.907, 1.271] 0.410
High triglyceride (≥150 mg/dL) n = 25 Age (yr) 0.504 [0.124, 2.048] 0.338
Uric Acid (mg/dL) 2.267 [0.560, 9.180] 0.251
Gender 0.474 [0.029, 7.801] 0.601
BMI (kg/m2) 1.406 [0.835, 2.369] 0.200
Low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL)
n = 33
Age (yr) 0.210 [0.031, 1.008] 0.110
Uric Acid (mg/dL) 65.751 [2.509,1723.076] 0.012
Gender 0.040 [0.001, 2.003] 0.107
BMI (kg/m2) 1.559 [0.764, 3.182] 0.223

All the models were adjusted by gender (men compared with women), age (continuous), body mass index (continuous) and concentration of uric acid (continuous)

*The unit of the exposures for the OR estimate was the presence or absence of Metabolic

Syndrome or its components- abdominal obesity, high triglycerides and low HDL-C