Table 4.
Logistic regression analysis of some factors associated with urogenital schistosomiasis in the study population
| Parameter | OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| School | EP Manbongko bord | 0.43 (0.11–1.84) | 0.276 |
| EP Matta Barrage | 0.54 (0.16–1.76) | 0.318 | |
| EP Matta village | 1.00 | ||
| Gender | Female | 1.33 ().72–2.45) | 0.366 |
| Male | 1.00 | ||
| Age | <10 years | 1.18 (0.56–2.45) | 0.665 |
| ≥10 years | 1.00 | ||
| Knowledge about schistosomiasis | Yes | 0.98 (0.48–2.02) | 0.959 |
| No | 1.00 | ||
| Frequent contact with water from dam | Yes | 248.4 (35.97–2123.32) | <0.001 |
| No | 1.00 | ||
| Wear shoes regularly | No | 0.98 (0.44–2.18) | 0.967 |
| Yes | 1.00 | ||
| Occupation of parents | Employed | 0.16 (0.02–5.31) | 0.307 |
| Farming | 1.49 (0.74–3.01) | 0.270 | |
| Fishing | 0.32 (0.12–0.82) | 0.019 | |
| Trading | 1.00 | ||