Skip to main content
. 2017 May 12;15:789–800. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.005

Table 4.

Regions showing a negative correlation between fractional anisotropy and cognitive flexibility in the cerebral palsy group.

Cluster number Cluster size (mm3) Mean FA (SD) (CP/controls) Anatomical regions
JHU white matter atlas Harvard-Oxford cortical structural atlas
1 20,951 0.450 (0.104)/
0.479 (0.110)
MS Body and splenium of corpus callosum
B Posterior corona radiata Cingulate gyrus (posterior division)
LH Tapetum
Retrolenticular part of internal capsule
Posterior thalamic radiation (include optic radiation)
Cingulum (cingulate gyrus)
Superior longitudinal fasciculus
Precentral gyrus
Postcentral gyrus
Lingual gyrus
Occipital fusiform gyrus
Supramarginal gyrus (anterior and posterior division)
Intracalcarine cortex
Supracalcarine cortex
Cuneal cortex
Planum temporale
Inferior temporal gyrus (temporo-occipital part)
2 245 0.379 (0.070)/
0.392 (0.074)
RH Lateral occipital cortex (superior division)
Superior parietal lobe
Precuneous cortex
3 69 0.379 (0.070)/
0.392 (0.074)
RH Superior parietal lobe
4 54 0.453 (0.080)/
0.474 (0.085)
RH Cingulate gyrus (anterior division)

B: bilateral; CP: cerebral palsy; FA: fractional anisotropy; JHU: John Hopkins University; LH: left hemisphere; MS: medial structure; RH: right hemisphere; SD: standard deviation. Discrepancies between fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity results are indicated as follows. Bold indicates regions that are significant with both fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity. Italics indicate regions that only show the same result between fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity in one hemisphere.