Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 4;7:4620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04393-2

Table 2.

Allelic associations of gene variations with keratoconus using cohorts from both GWAS and subsequent replication studies.

No. Gene/locus SNP No. of cohorts Ethnicity Associated allele vs. Reference allele Pooled sample size Outcome* Heterogeneity Egger’s test (P)
Case Control P OR (95% CI) P (Q) I2 (%)
1 FOXO1 rs2721051 5 Multiple ancestries C vs. T 1,345 7,246 5.6 × 10−11 0.65 (0.57–0.74) 0.491 0 0.35
2 RXRA-COL5A1 rs1536482 4 Whites G vs. A 1333 7276 2.5 × 10−9 0.77 (0.70–0.84) 0.819 0 0.89
3 FNDC3B rs4894535 4 Multiple ancestries T vs. C 1,182 6,563 1.4 × 10−8 1.39 (1.24–1.55) 0.628 0 0.76
4 IMMP2L rs757219 3 Whites C vs. T 1,052 6,604 6.1 × 10−7 1.45 (1.25–1.67) 0.266 26 0.61
rs214884 3 Whites G vs. A 1,051 6,603 2.3 × 10−5 1.56 (1.27–1.91) 0.157 46 0.89
5 BANP-ZNF469 rs9938149 5 Multiple ancestries C vs. A 1,346 7,248 1.3 × 10−5 0.79 (0.70–0.88) 0.422 12 0.77
6 KCND3 rs4839200 2 Whites A vs. G 745 6,084 3.9 × 10−4 1.63 (1.25–2.14) 0.068 70 n.a.
7 RAB3GAP1 rs4954218 3 Whites G vs. T 1049 6604 8.2 × 10−4 0.64 (0.50–0.83) 0.021 75 0.19
8 UBXD2 rs6430585 3 Whites A vs. C 1049 6604 1.1 × 10−3 1.36 (1.13–1.64) 0.065 63 0.62
9 13q33.3 rs1328089 2 Whites C vs. T 747 6,086 1.7 × 10−3 1.38 (1.13–1.68) 0.109 61 n.a.
rs1328083 3 Whites G vs. T 1,050 6,604 3.0 × 10−2 1.38 (1.03–1.84) 0.008 82 0.88
10 MPDZ-NFIB rs1324183 5 Multiple ancestries C vs. A 1,349 7,250 5.5 × 10−3 0.76 (0.63–0.92) 0.034 67 0.75
11 COL5A1 rs7044529 6 Multiple ancestries C vs. T 1,652 7,766 7.0 × 10−3 0.84 (0.74–0.95) 0.432 18 0.051
12 LOX rs10519694 3 Whites T vs. C 692 6,599 0.018 0.76 (0.61–0.95) 0.138 50 0.74
rs2956540 4 Multiple ancestries G vs. C 901 6,788 0.28 0.83 (0.59–1.16) <0.001 87 0.35
13 HGF rs3735520 6 Multiple ancestries T vs. C 1,311 4,545 0.027 1.25 (1.03–1.51) 0.002 72 0.60
rs1014091 2 Whites A vs. G 362 480 0.41 0.70 (0.30–1.64) 0.005 87 n.a.
rs2286194 2 Whites A vs. T 354 960 0.70 0.85 (0.39–1.89) 0.001 91 n.a.
14 19p12 rs8111998 3 Whites T vs. C 1,049 6,603 0.035 1.48 (1.03–2.13) 0.018 75 0.74
15 PPP3CA rs2659546 3 Whites A vs. G 1,050 6,602 0.06 1.46 (0.99–2.15) 0.014 75 0.77
16 3q26.2 rs6792542 3 Whites C vs. A 1,051 6,603 0.15 1.22 (0.93–1.61) 0.001 84 0.48
17 BHLHB2 rs6442925 3 Whites T vs. C 1,050 6,603 0.21 1.28 (0.87–1.88) <0.001 89 0.93
18 KIF26B rs12407427 2 Whites T vs. C 747 6,085 0.28 1.34 (0.79–2.30) 0.001 92 n.a.
19 BIRC8 rs1428642 3 Whites A vs. G 1,050 6,602 0.29 0.84 (0.61–1.16) <0.001 90 0.45
20 LRRN1 rs3749350 3 Whites T vs. G 1,052 6,603 0.32 1.24 (0.81–1.88) <0.001 89 0.64
21 12p13.3 rs1978238 2 Whites C vs. A 746 6,086 0.36 0.81 (0.52–1.27) <0.001 92 n.a.
22 COL4A3 rs7606754 2 Multiple ancestries A vs. G 760 3,061 0.42 1.10 (0.87–1.38) 0.155 50 n.a.

*A random-effects model was used.

Multiple ancestries included 2 or more ethnic groups from Whites and Asian (Arabic, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, or Indian).

CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ration; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism; n.a. = not applicable; No. = number.