Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 14;8(2):68–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2016.11.003

Table 2.

Average response time (in seconds) of different parts of P. latifolia Roxb. and standard in the tail flick model.

Group Dose (mg/kg) Mean basal reading ± S.E.M Mean reaction time (sec) ± S.E.M (percentage reaction time)
15 min 30 min 45 min 60 min 120 min
Control Vehicle 2.23 ± 0.15 2.30 ± 0.17 2.40 ± 0.12 2.27 ± 0.18 2.47 ± 0.15 2.31 ± 0.14
Pentazocine 15 3.11 ± 0.38 4.85 ± 0.21 (25.25) 7.35 ± 0.29 (61.54) 6.5 ± 0.46 (49.20) 6.05 ± 0.36 (42.71) 4.84 ± 0.19 (25.21)
Whole root 100 2.95 ± 0.45 3.46 ± 0.38a (7.23) 4.50 ± 0.46a (22.0) 4.70 ± 0.45 (24.82) 4.30 ± 0.22 (19.14) 4.07 ± 0.44 (15.88)
200 2.6 ± 0.39 3.58 ± 0.45a (13.24) 4.26 ± 0.30a (22.42) 5.44 ± 0.46 (38.37) 4.4 ± 0.42a (24.3) 3.96 ± 0.35 (18.3)
400 2.38 ± 0.15 3.46 ± 0.38a (14.17) 4.55 ± 0.46a (28.47) 5.67 ± 0.33 (43.17) 4.93 ± 0.22 (33.46) 4.0 ± 0.43 (21.25)
Stem 100 2.14 ± 0.40 2.40 ± 0.21a (3.35) 2.30 ± 0.31ab (13.86) 4.03 ± 0.35ab (24.04) 3.49 ± 0.35ab (17.17) 2.81 ± 0.32a (14.75)
200 2.60 ± 0.42 3.25 ± 0.40 (8.78) 4.10 ± 0.35a (20.27) 4.35 ± 0.42a (23.64) 4.65 ± 0.39 (27.70) 3.72 ± 0.46 (17.43)
400 2.0 ± 0.25 3.04 ± 0.16a (13.0) 3.83 ± 0.31a (22.8) 4.11 ± 0.40ab (26.3) 4.57 ± 0.35a (32.12) 3.44 ± 0.36a (18.0)
Leaf 100 2.51 ± 0.63 3.13 ± 0.34a (8.22) 3.71 ± 0.44ac (16.02) 4.51 ± 0.44a (26.7) 3.96 ± 0.34a (19.35) 3.81 ± 0.43 (17.35)
200 2.7 ± 0.17 3.53 ± 0.21 (11.36) 4.35 ± 0.36a (22.6) 5.29 ± 0.41 (35.47) 4.43 ± 0.45a (23.69) 3.93 ± 0.44 (16.84)
400 2.5 ± 0.41 3.55 ± 0.38 (14.0) 4.77 ± 0.38a (30.26) 5.62 ± 0.37c (41.6) 5.01 ± 0.44 (33.46) 4.03 ± 0.36 (20.4)

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was done by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni-test (p < 0.05). a when compared with pentazocine, b when compared with whole root and c when compared with whole stem.