Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 23;8(4):554–559. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12595

Table 2.

Maternal–fetal outcomes in the three study groups

Group NGT Increment Stock P‐value
Cases 1475 116 92
HDCP (%) 1.4ab (n = 21) 12.9a (n = 15) 17.4b (n = 16) <0.001
PROM (%) 5.9 (n = 87) 8.6 (n = 10) 10.9 (n = 10) 0.097
Cesarean section (%) 66.9 cd (n = 987) 87.1c (n = 101) 93.5d (n = 86) <0.001
Premature labor (%) 10.5 (n = 155) 11.2 (n = 13) 16.3 (n = 15) 0.221
Duration of pregnancy (weeks) 38.18 ± 0.17 38.21 ± 0.14 38.20 ± 0.11 0.103
Macrosomia (%) 3.5 (n = 52) 16.4 (n = 19) 29.3 (n = 27) <0.001
Neonatal hypoglycemia (%) 0.7 (n = 10) 12.1 (n = 14) 26.1 (n = 24) <0.001
Neonatal jaundice (%) 2.8 (n = 41) 5.2 (n = 6) 5.4 (n = 5) 0.146
Neonatal asphyxia (%) 4.5 (n = 66) 6.0 (n = 7) 8.7 (n = 8) 0.152
Ponderal Index (kg/m3) 26.1 ± 3.4 25.7 ± 5.8 26.8 ± 6.1 0.112

P < 0.01 in hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP) and cesarean section, P < 0.05 among all groups in macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia. a,b,c,dThe differences between the values labeled with the same letter were observed through pairwise comparison. NGT, normal glucose tolerance; PROM, premature rupture of membranes.