Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 9;6:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.01.003

Table 2.

Effect of endocardial pacing vs. mid-myocardial pacing vs. epicardial pacing on TM–Epi before and after ibutilide administration (n = 12).

Endo pacing Mid pacing Epi pacing P value
ANOVA Endo vs. Mid Mid vs. Epi Epi vs. Endo
Before ibutilide 8.6 ± 1.1 9.0 ± 0.9 21.8 ± 2.1 < 0.001 0.552 < 0.001 < 0.001
After ibutilide 8.8 ± 0.8 8.4 ± 1.1 23.2 ± 2.2 < 0.001 0.561 < 0.001 < 0.001

Endo indicates endocardial; Mid, mid-myocardial; Epi, epicardial; and ANOVA, analysis of variance.

P < 0.05 (vs. after ibutilide).