Table 2.
Effect of endocardial pacing vs. mid-myocardial pacing vs. epicardial pacing on TM–Epi before and after ibutilide administration (n = 12).
| Endo pacing | Mid pacing | Epi pacing |
P value |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANOVA | Endo vs. Mid | Mid vs. Epi | Epi vs. Endo | ||||
| Before ibutilide | 8.6 ± 1.1 | 9.0 ± 0.9 | 21.8 ± 2.1 | < 0.001 | 0.552 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| After ibutilide | 8.8 ± 0.8 | 8.4 ± 1.1 | 23.2 ± 2.2⁎ | < 0.001 | 0.561 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Endo indicates endocardial; Mid, mid-myocardial; Epi, epicardial; and ANOVA, analysis of variance.
P < 0.05 (vs. after ibutilide).