Table 5.

Bivariate Cholesky A, C, and E decomposition comparisons and summaries for each personality disorder with WAVE 1 DSM-IV ALCOHOL USE DISORDER ordinal symptom criteria composite

Bivariate model fit comparisons					Correlations (95% CI)			Proportion of total variance in symptoms of ALCOHOL USE DISORDER shared (with each predictor) versus unshared (95% CI)
Predictor	Model	−2LL	df	AIC	rP	rA	rE	Ashared	Aunshared	Eshared	Eunshared
Borderline PD (total)	ACE	8806.52	5266	−1725.48	0.33 (0.28 – 0.39)	0.41 (0.20 – 0.62)	0.29 (0.18 – 0.40)	5% (1 – 12%)	26% (14 – 37%)	6% (2 – 12%)	63% (52 – 75%)
	AE	8809.00	5269	−1729.00
	CE	8817.40	5269	−1720.61
	E	8900.76	5272	−1643.241
Antisocial PD (total)	ACE	6296.44	5266	−4235.56	0.43 (0.37 – 0.49)	0.60 (0.34 – 0.88)	0.35 (0.22 – 0.47)	10% (3–21%)	18% (5–30%)	9% (3–17%)	63% (51 – 76%)
	AE	6296.47	5269	−4241.53
	CE	6311.77	5269	−4226.23
	E	6343.73	5272	−4200.268
Borderline PD (trimmed)	ACE	8515.76	5266	−2016.24	0.25 (0.19 – 0.31)	0.33 (0.10 – 0.56)	0.21 (0.08 – 0.33)	3% (0 – 10%)	29% (16 – 40%)	3% (0 – 7%)	65% (53 – 77%)
	AE	8515.87	5269	−2022.13
	CE	8528.44	5269	−2009.57
	E	8598.42	5272	−1945.58
Antisocial PD (trimmed)	ACE	5903.17	5266	−4628.84	0.38 (0.31 – 0.44)	0.57 (0.27 – 0.90)	0.29 (0.14 – 0.42)	9% (2 – 21%)	18% (4 – 31%)	6% (1 – 14%)	67% (55 – 80%)
	AE	5903.17	5269	−4634.84
	CE	5914.90	5269	−4623.10
	E	5942.26	5272	−4601.74

CI = confidence interval; −2LL = −2 X Log Likelihood; AIC = Akaike Information Criteria; ACE = additive genetic + shared environment + unique environmental risks; Trimmed = Borderline PD excluded ‘Impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging (e.g., spending, sex, substance abuse, reckless driving, binge eating)’; Antisocial PD excluded ‘Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behavior as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest.’