Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Mar;46(3):899–909. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2632-1

Table 3.

Differential Item Functioning Analysis for Words Produced.

Word HR ASD Non-ASD Comparison
Ability Ability Standard Error Group Ability Ability Standard Error Ability Contrast†† More Likely for… Rasch-Welch t statistic
baabaa −5.31 .49 LR −3.60 .28 1.71 HR ASD 3.02**
block −2.54 1.06 LR 1.45 1.68 3.99 HR ASD 2.01*
bye −5.31 .49 LR −4.10 .25 1.21 HR ASD 2.19*

baabaa −5.31 .49 HR −3.89 .25 1.42 HR ASD 2.55**
uncle −2.54 1.08 HR 1.08 1.14 3.61 HR ASD 2.30*
hello −3.32 .77 HR −1.17 .53 2.15 HR ASD 2.31*
bite −2.54 1.06 HR 1.08 1.14 3.62 HR ASD 2.32*

Note.

Ability level measured in logits, (DIF: differential item functioning). The more negative an ability estimate for a group the more likely it was produced by the specified group. Only meaningful differences are shown DIF>1 and p < 0.05..

††

Ability contrasts calculated as HR ASD Ability minus comparison group Ability. Absolute values greater than one indicate large effect size (see appendix A).

*

Significant at p≤0.05,

**

p<0.01.