. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 5.

Published in final edited form as: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Jun 9;99(20):8667–8680. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6708-9

Table 3.

Growth rate and lag phase duration in aerobic shake flask cultures

Acetic acid treatment	Strain S288c leu2Δ/	lag (h)	μ (h⁻¹)
No acid	pGP564	1.27±0.06^a	0.34±0.00^a
	pGP564-YGPM18p06	1.33±0.06^a	0.36±0.00^b
	pGP564-PEP3	1.27±0.06^a	0.39±0.00^c
	pGP564-STM1	2.17±0.32^b	0.38±0.02^bcd
	pGP564-PEP5	1.64±0.04^c	0.38±0.00^d
140 mM	pGP564	16.47±0.47^a	0.19±0.01^a
	pGP564-YGPM18p06	5.20±0.35^b	0.25±0.01^b
	pGP564-PEP3	3.97±0.59^c	0.20±0.03^a
	pGP564-STM1	3.73±0.21^c	0.27±0.00^b
	pGP564-PEP5	6.14±0.29^d	0.15±0.02^a
160 mM	pGP564	16.5±0.56^a	0.12±0.00^a
	pGP564-YGPM18p06	5.37±0.06^b	0.20±0.01^b
	pGP564-PEP3	6.23±0.25^c	0.12±0.00^a
	pGP564-STM1	5.20±0.26^b	0.25±0.01^c
	pGP564-PEP5	18.64±2.39^a	0.18±0.00^d

Dissimilar superscripts for lag or μ values within a treatment (0, 140, or 160 mM acetic acid) indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05)