Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jan 5;60(1):159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.01.001

Table 2.

Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Adherence Following Myocardial Infarction

Author Year Country n Definition of SES Effect Direction Effect Size
Dunlay et al. (38) 2009 USA 179 Education −* Those with post-secondary education more likely to attend CR (OR 3.32)
Jin et al. (39) 2014 China 328 Education −* Those with lower education are less likely to attend CR (OR 8.13)
Melville et al. (78) 1999 UK 464 Composite measure −* Each unit increase in deprivation score reduces odds of attending CR by 8–15% (ORs 0.92, 0.85)
Nielsen et al. (8) 2008 Denmark 200 Income −* Low-income patients less likely to attend CR (OR 0.20)
Oldridge (79) 1984 Canada 733 Job type −* Dropout from CR higher for those in blue collar jobs (adjusted RR 1.71)
Pell et al. (80) 1996 Scotland 316 Composite measure −* Each unit increase in deprivation score reduces odds of completing CR (OR 0.96)
Suaya et al (40) 2007 USA 267,427 Insurance type −* Those with Medicaid insurance are less likely to attend CR (adjusted OR 0.44)
Alter et al. (81) 2013 Canada 1,368 Income 37% of low-income patients attended CR vs 60% of higher-income
Ramm et al. (82) 2001 New Zealand 324 Education Those with secondary school or less were less likely to attend CR (p<0.05)
Stern & Cleary (83) 1981 USA 784 Composite measure Those dropping out of CR were more likely to be lower-social class (46% of dropouts vs. 34% of completers)
Young et al., (84) 1990 USA 246 Education Patients with lower educational attainment were less likely to enroll in CR (RR 0.40)
Lane et al. (85) 2001 UK 263 Education =* Education was not a significant predictor in multivariate models
Winberg & Fridlund (86) 2002 Sweden 200 Education = Educational attainment did not predict CR attendance
Altenhoener et al. (66) 2005 Germany 536 Composite measure + 90% of low- and middle-income patients went to CR compared to 78% of high-income patients

Note: Significance is defined as the original author's determination of statistical significance. A criterion of p < .05 was used across all studies. A + denotes low-SES is correlated with behavior change, an = denotes no significant relationship and a − denotes low-SES is negatively correlated with behavior change. An * denotes studies using positively multivariate analyses that accounted for other common predictors of behavior change such as age, gender, race and history and severity of disease.