Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;372(1727):20160238. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0238

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(a) Average (95CI range: 0.02–0.07) final distance (D) between the nutritional state of individuals and their intake target in environments containing two asymmetrically imbalanced foods for various movement noise weight modes (η) for 12 combinations of abundance (Ab) and fractal dimension (FD) (figure 1c). Social influence (σ) = 0.005. (b) Average (+95CI) final nutritional state (p/c) for the same simulations showed in (a). All model parameters and variables are described in table 1.