Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 2;475(8):2027–2042. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5293-x

Table 6.

Chi-square distribution of cup, stem, polyethylene, and surgical approach among the three wear groups

Variable Wear group p Value
High Low Moderate
Cup
 HG I 3 11 13
 HG II 6 9 7
 Mark II 2 1 4 0.124
 Trilogy® 8 4 5
Stem
 Cemented 5 7 3
 Cementless 14 18 26 0.215
Polyethylene
 GUR 1050 8 4 5
 GUR 4150 11 21 24 0.917
Surgical approach
 Anterolateral 12 6 1
 Posterior 17 17 26 0.002