Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 6;11:348. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00348

Table 2.

Pairwise comparisons between groups on the four working memory composites.

Working memory composites groups Mean difference SE p 98.75% confidence interval
Lower bound Upper bound
Verbal Storage HIV-I HIV-EU 4.356 2.165 0.136 –1.901 10.613
HIV-UU –6.874 2.541 0.022 –14.219 0.471
HIV-EU HIV-UU –11.230 2.368 <0.001ˆ* –18.073 –4.387
Verbal Processing HIV-I HIV-EU –0.027 0.010 0.016 –0.055 0.001
HIV-UU –0.068 0.011 <0.001ˆ* –0.101 –0.036
HIV-EU HIV-UU –0.041 0.011 <0.001ˆ* –0.072 –0.011
Visuospatial Storage HIV-I HIV-EU –3.353 2.358 0.469 –10.170 3.463
HIV-UU –6.000 2.769 0.093 –14.002 2.003
HIV-EU HIV-UU –2.647 2.579 0.917 –10.102 4.809
Visuospatial Processing HIV-I HIV-EU –6.592 2.353 0.016 –13.393 0.209
HIV-UU –10.148 2.762 0.001ˆ* –18.132 –2.164
HIV-EU HIV-UU –3.556 2.573 0.505 –10.994 3.883

p < 0.0125 (Bonferroni correction).