Table 1.
Study | Reference standard | Treatment | Method | Imaging modality | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Woo et al.15 Korea N = 190 | Radical prostatectomy | Surgery | Periprostatic and subcutaneous fat thicknesses. | Preoperative mid-sagittal T2W MRI. Measured the shortest perpendicular distance from symphysis pubis to skin and prostate. | Positive correlation between the periprostatic fat thickness and GS* |
Roermund et al.7 Netherlands N = 902 | Prostate biopsies (? number) | Brachytherapy | Periprostatic fat area (cm2)/subcutaneous fat thickness (cm). | Two transverse 3 mm-thick CT slices at different levels. Pelvic fat was defined by the density range −190 to −30 HU*. Fat density (%) was calculated by dividing periprostatic fat area by total contour area. | Periprostatic fat area and density were not correlated with Prostate cancer aggressiveness |
Roermund et al. (2010) Netherlands N = 932 | Prostate biopsies (? number) | External radiotherapy and brachytherapy | Periprostatic fat area (cm2)/Subcutaneous fat thickness. | Single transverse CT slice at the level of the femoral head and greater trochanter. Defined the pelvic fat by the density range −190 to −30 HU*. Fat density (%) was calculated by dividing periprostatic fat area by total contour area. | Higher periprostatic fat density had more often aggressive prostate cancer. |
Bhindi et al.25 Canada N = 931 | 10–12 prostate biopsies | unknown | Periprostatic fat thickness. | Trans rectal ultrasonography (TRUS). The periprostatic fat was measured from the shortest perpendicular distance between pubic bone and prostate. | Periprostatic fat can be used as predictor for prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy. |
Tan et al.17 USA N = 295 | 12 core prostate biopsies | unknown | Periprostatic fat volume and prostate volume | 3T MRIs. Periprostatic fat was marked from the level of its base to apex on T2W MR images ‘’cranial to caudal”. Ratio was calculated (fat volume/prostate volume) | Higher ratio may be a risk factor, is significantly associated with higher Gleason score |
Zhang et al.16 China N = 184 | Radical prostatectomy | Surgery | Periprostatic fat area (cm2) and Subcutaneous fat thickness | T2W transverse MRI slice at the level of the femoral head and greater trochanter of the femur. | Periprostatic fat can predict the prognosis of patient with radical retropubic prostatectomy. |
*GS = Gleason score. *HU = Hounsfield unit.