Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 5;7:4630. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04951-8

Table 4.

The relationship between post RP Gleason score, age, body mass index (BMI), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and different fat measurements using Pearson correlation coefficient.

Correlations
NPFV AFA SFT PSA BMI Biopsy GS Post-op GS
Age Pearson C. 0.154 0.046 −0.090 0.061 −0.149 0.133 0.147
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.050 0.561 0.256 0.444 0.064 0.092 0.062
N 162 162 162 162 156 162 162
NPFV Pearson C. 1 0.129 0.042 0.036 0.117 0.331** 0.294**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.101 0.596 0.645 0.146 0.000 0.000
N 162 162 162 162 156 162 162
AFA Pearson C. 0.129 1 0.644** 0.207** 0.640** 0.098 0.046
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.101 0.000 0.008 0.000 0.213 0.563
N 162 162 162 162 156 162 162
SFT Pearson C. 0.042 0.644** 1 0.162* 0.794** 0.062 −0.004
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.596 0.000 0.039 0.000 0.435 0.960
N 162 162 162 162 156 162 162
PSA Pearson C. 0.036 0.207** 0.162* 1 0.121 0.169* 0.326**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.645 0.008 0.039 0.132 0.031 0.000
N 162 162 162 162 156 162 162
BMI Pearson C. 0.117 0.640** 0.794** 0.121 1 0.079 0.020
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.146 0.000 0.000 0.132 0.326 0.800
N 156 156 156 156 156 156 156

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

NPFV = Normalised periprostatic fat volume; AFA = Abdominal fat area; SFT = Subcutaneous fat thickness; PSA = Prostate specific antigen; BMI = Body mass index; GS = Gleason score.