Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 5;14:86. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0540-9

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for analytic samples

mRFEI analysis Marketing strategy analyses
(n = 576) Soft drinks (n = 465) Vegetables (n = 257)
Age (mean(SD)) 9.1 (1.7) 9.1 (1.7) 9.0 (1.6)
Gender (n(%) boys) 284 (49.3%) 217 (46.7%) 109 (42.2%)
Household Income (n(%))
  < 45 K 111 (19.3%) 96 (20.6%) 48 (18.6%)
 45–65 K 114 (19.8%) 94 (20.2%) 45 (17.4%)
  > 65 K 351 (60.9%) 275 (59.1%) 165 (64.0%)
Language survey conducted (n (%) French) 320 (55.6%) 256 (55.1%) 149 (57.7%)
Healthful eating score (mean (SD)) 8.6 (3.6) 8.7 (3.6) 8.7 (3.6)
Unhealthful food score (mean (SD)) 1.6 (1.2) 1.6 (1.2) 1.6 (1.3)
External eating score (Range: 10–30; mean (SD)) 21 (4) 21 (4) 21 (4)
mRFEI (mean (SD)) 23.3 (11.7) 22.4 (10.5) 22.4 (10.7)
Soft drinks discount frequency (mean (SD)) 0.41 (0.19)a 0.50 (0.15) a
Soft drinks display (mean (SD)) 0.26 (0.22) a 0.38 (0.17) a
Soft drinks regular price per serving (mean (SD)) 0.37 (0.12) a 0.30 (0.04) a
Soft drinks variety (mean (SD)) 128.2 (60.3) a 171.8 (44.7) a
Vegetable discount frequency (mean (SD)) 0.47 (0.13)
Vegetable display (mean (SD)) 0.05 (0.04)
Vegetable regular price per serving (mean (SD)) 0.31 (0.08)
Vegetable variety (mean (SD)) 410.5 (116.7)

mRFEI modified Retail Food Environment Index (proportion of food retailers classified as healthful), SD Standard Deviation

a mean difference statistically significant (p < 0.05)