Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 21;18(Suppl 1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12865-017-0204-1

Table 3.

Effect of different cutoff values for RF on RATE results. A cutoff of RF ≥ 1.3 gave the best results with MCC = 0.314

Cutoffs TP FP FN TN Total Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Precision False Positive Rate Matthews Correlation Coefficient
RF ≥ 1.00 34 44 6 18 102 0.510 0.850 0.290 0.436 0.710 0.162
RF ≥ 1.20 33 36 7 26 102 0.578 0.825 0.419 0.478 0.581 0.255
RF ≥ 1.25 33 35 7 27 102 0.588 0.825 0.435 0.485 0.565 0.270
RF ≥ 1.30 33 32 7 30 102 0.618 0.825 0.484 0.508 0.516 0.314
RF ≥ 1.35 31 31 9 31 102 0.608 0.775 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.275
RF ≥ 1.40 31 30 9 32 102 0.618 0.775 0.516 0.508 0.484 0.290
RF ≥ 1.45 30 29 10 33 102 0.618 0.750 0.532 0.508 0.468 0.279
RF ≥ 1.50 29 27 11 35 102 0.627 0.725 0.565 0.518 0.435 0.284
RF ≥ 1.75 26 24 14 38 102 0.627 0.650 0.613 0.520 0.387 0.257
RF ≥ 2.00 21 22 19 40 102 0.598 0.525 0.645 0.488 0.355 0.168
RF ≥ 2.50 16 15 24 47 102 0.618 0.400 0.758 0.516 0.242 0.168