Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2017 Feb 10;124(5):709–719. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.004

Table 2. Visual Field, Structural and Vascular Measurements Corresponding to the Affected and Intact Hemifields.

Variables Healthy eyes (n = 28) Glaucoma eyes (n = 58) p-valueA p-valueB p-valueC
Intact hemifield Affected hemifield
SAP mean sensitivity (dB) 30.0 ± 1.7 29.0 ± 1.8 26.0 ± 3.7 0.089 <0.001* <0.001§
SAP total deviation (dB) 0.1 ± 1.4 -0.1 ± 1.4 -6.7 ± 6.4 0.076 <0.001* <0.001§
SAP pattern deviation (dB) -1.3 ± 0.3 -1.3 ± 0.3 -7.3 ± 6.1 0.189 <0.001* <0.001§
Circumpapillary vessel density (%) 62.4 ± 2.9 59.0 ± 3.1 54.7 ± 5.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Perifoveal vessel density (%) 53.8 ± 2.1 51.1 ± 2.4 48.3 ± 4.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (μm) 95.0 ± 8.2 83.6 ± 9.3 72.1 ±10.9 <0.001 <0.001* <0.001§
Ganglion cell complex thickness (μm) 92.4 ± 5.1 87.3 ± 5.8 74.7 ± 7.8 0.002 <0.001* <0.001§

Values are shown in mean ± standard deviation

A

Comparison between intact hemifield of glaucoma eyes and healthy eyes

B

Comparison between affected hemifield of glaucoma eyes and healthy eyes

C

Comparison between affected and intact hemifield of glaucoma eyes

The Comparison was performed by using independent samples t-test

The Comparison was performed by using paired t-test

*

The Comparison was performed by using Mann-Whitney U test.

§

The Comparison was performed by using Wilcoxon signed-rank test

SAP: standard automated perimetry; dB: decibel; μm: micrometer