Table 1. Studies describing the mathematical constraints on FST.
Reference | Number of alleles | Number of subpopulations | Variable in terms of which constraints are reporteda |
---|---|---|---|
Hedrick (1999) | unspecified value | ||
Long and Kittles (2003) | unspecified value | fixed finite value | |
Rosenberg et al. (2003) | 2 | 2 | δ |
Hedrick (2005) | unspecified value | fixed finite value | |
Maruki et al. (2012) | 2 | 2 | M |
Jakobsson et al. (2013) | unspecified value | 2 | M |
Edge and Rosenberg (2014) | fixed finite value | 2 | M |
This article | 2 | fixed finite value | M |
and denote the within-subpopulation and total heterozygosities, respectively. δ denotes the absolute difference in the frequency of a specific allele between two subpopulations, and M denotes the frequency of the most frequent allele.
Instead of heterozygosities or some studies consider homozygosities or