Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 26;20(2):150–159. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2017.20.2.150

Table 6. Summary of previous studies for EGFR gene mutation in triple-negative breast cancer.

Author (year) Specimen Population Method Result
Reis-Filho et al. (2006) [16] 47 Metaplastic carcinomas British Direct sequencing No mutations
Toyama et al. (2008) [13] 58 TNBCs Japanese Real-time PCR No mutations
Jacot et al. (2011) [15] 229 TNBCs French Direct sequencing No mutations
Lv et al. (2011) [18] 139 Breast carcinomas Chinese Real-time PCR 1.4% (10% in TNBCs), 19del and L858R
Teng et al. (2011) [19] 70 TNBCs Chinese Direct sequencing 11.4%, 19del and L858R
Martin et al. (2012) [11] 38 TNBC with basal-like features Switzerland Direct sequencing No mutations
Grob et al. (2012) [10] 65 TNBCs German Direct sequencing No mutations
Santarpia et al. (2012) [17] 116 TNBCs American Sequenom technology 3.4%, Mutation types, not specified
Direct sequencing
Kim et al. (2013) [20] 105 TNBCs Korean PNA-clamping 1.0%, 19del
Secq et al. (2014) [12] 47 TNBCs French Direct sequencing No mutations
Tilch et al. (2014) [14] 50 TNBCs Australian Direct sequencing No mutations
57 Basal-like breast carcinomas
Nakajima et al. (2014) [9] 55 TNBCs Japanese SmartAmp2 method No mutations
Park et al. (2014) [21] 151 TNBCs Korean Direct sequencing 2.6%, G719A, V786M, L858R

REGFR=epidermal growth factor receptor; TNBC=triple-negative breast cancer; PCR=polymerase chain reaction; del=deletion; PNA-clamping=peptide nucleic acid-mediated polymerase chain reaction.