Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Photochem Photobiol. 2017 Feb 22;93(4):1115–1122. doi: 10.1111/php.12719

Table 2.

In-air light fluence and in-air light fluence rate conditions used in each PDT treatment group.

Index Fluence (J/cm2) ϕair (mW/cm2) PDT dose (μM J/cm2) Photofrin (μM) Photofrin variation (μM) [1O2]rx (mM) [1O2]rx variation (mM) Variation count
1 50 50 126.5 3.5 - 0.35 - 0 / 4
2 75 235.5 6.0 - 0.40 - 0 / 5
3 150 199.9 4.9 - 0.24 - 0 / 4

4 135 50 229.7 3.0 2.52 / 4.33* 0.66 0.45/0.91# 1 / 4
5 75 774.2 7.8 3.08 / 12.1* 0.93 0.27/1.25# 10 / 12
6 150 322.3 3.5 - 0.53 - 0 / 4

7 200 50 204.8 2.2 - 0.63 - 0 / 5
8 150 417.8 3.8 - 0.76 - 0 / 5

9 250 50 362.1 3.4 3.17 / 3.66* 1.03 0.97 / 1.09# 3 / 4
10 75 1380.1 5.8 1.88 / 12.6* 0.74 0.65 / 1.32# 8 / 10
11 150 393.0 3.1 2.45 / 5.32* 0.81 0.69 / 1.04# 2 / 9

Control 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 / 8
*

Photofrin concentration in tumors with complete and partial response is significantly different, p<0.05.

#

[1O2]rx concentration tumors with complete and partial response is significantly different, p<0.05

Variation is shown for (tumors with complete response) / (total number of tumors) at 14 days.