Table 5.
Marginal and Multivariate Cox models (treating Fluence, PDT dose, and [1O2]rx as continuous variables).
DF | Estimated Coefficients | Adjusted R-square | Likelihood Ratio Tests | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||
Fluence | PDT dose | [1O2]rx | Null | F | P | O | F + P | F + O | P + O | |||
Marginal models | ||||||||||||
1. Fluence | 1 | 0.0084 | 24.14% | 20.33 | ||||||||
p-value | <.0001 | <.0001 | ||||||||||
2. PDT dose | 1 | 0.0041 | 42.95% | 41.26 | ||||||||
p-value | <.0001 | <.0001 | ||||||||||
3. 1O2 | 1 | 2.8788 | 49.19% | 49.76 | ||||||||
p-value | <.0001 | <.0001 | ||||||||||
Multivariate models | ||||||||||||
4. F + P | 2 | 0.0044 | 0.0033 | 47.12% | 46.83 | 26.50 | 5.57 | |||||
p-value | .0019 | .0008 | <.0001 | <.0001 | .0183 | |||||||
5. F + O | 2 | 0.0001 | 2.8874 | 49.19% | 49.76 | 29.43 | <0.01 | |||||
p-value | .9824 | <.0001 | <.0001 | <.0001 | 0.9822 | |||||||
6. P + O | 2 | 0.0015 | 2.2747 | 51.84% | 53.68 | 12.42 | 3.92 | |||||
p-value | .0805 | <.0001 | <.0001 | .0004 | .0477 | |||||||
7. F + P + O | 3 | 0.0006 | 0.0015 | 2.1459 | 51.88% | 53.75 | 33.42 | 12.49 | 3.99 | 6.92 | 3.99 | 0.07 |
p-value | .7936 | .0798 | .0056 | <.0001 | <.0001 | .0019 | .1360 | .0085 | .0458 | .7913 |
DF: degree of freedom; Null: the null model with no factors; F: model 1, Fluence; P: model 2, PDT dose; O: model 3, [1O2]rx; F + P: model 4, Fluence + PDT; F + O: model 5, Fluence + [1O2]rx; P + O: model 6, PDT dose + [1O2]rx; F + P + O: model 7, Fluence + PDT dose + [1O2]rx. Likelihood ratio tests compare the multivariate models to the models with the same but fewer factors. A small p-value means the model with more factors is significantly better than the model with fewer factors.