Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 6;7:4793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04116-7

Table 1.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of DFS in HCC patients.

Variable Number Univariate analysis Multivariate
P value HR (95% CI) P value
Tumour HNF-1B expression
 Low vs High 57 vs 33 0.001* 2.406 (1.415,4.092) 0.007*
Tumour size
 <5 cm vs ≥ 5 cm 38 vs 52 0.010* NS
Tumour number
 Single vs Multiple 92 vs 8 0.339 NA
Cirrhosis
 No vs Yes 24 vs 66 0.001* NS
TNM stage
 I/II vs III 82 vs 8 0.005* 3.596 (1.388,9.314) 0.008*
HbsAg
 Negative vs Positive 74 vs 16 0.794 NA
Serum AFP
 <400 vs ≥400 67 vs 23 0.499 NA
Edmondson grade
 I/II vs III 62 vs 28 0.021* 1.776 (1.086,2.907) 0.022*
Encapsulation
 No vs Yes 26 vs 64 0.142 NA
Portal vein thrombosis
 No vs Yes 65 vs 25 0.147 NA
Microvascular invasion
 No vs Yes 35 vs 55 0.451 NA
Macrovascular invasion
 No vs Yes 85 vs 5 0.005* NS

NA, not adopted; NS, not significant; HR, hazard ratio; Factors with p < 0.05 in univariate analysis were used for further multivariate analysis. *P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.