Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 6;7:4772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05118-1

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Exemplar neurons illustrating the results of cross-modal testing in various conditions. (A) The normal profile of multisensory enhancement in superior colliculus (SC) neurons. Left: a neuron’s visual (dark gray) and auditory (light gray) receptive fields (RFs), and the positions of the visual and auditory stimuli, are shown on the schematic. Conventions are the same as in Fig. 2. Middle: rasters (trials ordered bottom-to-top), show responses to visual (V), auditory (A) and spatiotemporally concordant visual-auditory (VA) stimuli. Electronic traces of the stimuli are shown above the rasters. Right: A summary graph of the mean response magnitudes and the multisensory enhancement index (ME) show that the multisensory response significantly exceeded the strongest unisensory comparator response (V) in this normal exemplar. (B) With omnidirectional noise-rearing, however, RF register was less precise, and the VA response was no greater than the V response in this baseline condition. (C) After 6 months of subsequent experience in a normal housing environment (NE-6), the typical multisensory SC neuron showed little change from baseline. RF overlap was still less precise than normal and no capacity for multisensory enhancement was evident. Its response to the cross-modal stimulus was no greater than to one of the component stimuli. (D1) This profile was little changed after an additional 6 months of housing in the normal environment (NE-12). (D2) In contrast, after weekly visual-auditory cross-modal exposure sessions conducted during the same period, the typical neuron exhibited good RF register as well as multisensory enhancement capabilities (VA Trained). Sum = the addition of the two unisensory responses. Error bars indicate SEM. **P ≤ 0.001.