Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 6;7:4772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05118-1

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Visual-auditory receptive field register increases with cross-modal exposure. (A) The classically-defined visual and auditory RFs of a representative neuron from a normally reared animal are shown at the top, with the visual (solid line) and auditory (dashed line) spatial response profiles shown below (y-axis = mean # impulses/response, normalized by maximum). Note the good register between the RFs using either metric. (B) However, this cross-modal RF register was very poor in most neurons of noise-reared animals during baseline tests, and is illustrated by the exemplar. (C) Poor cross-modal RF register remained evident even after 6 months of subsequent housing in the normal environment (NE-6). (D1) The poor RF registers remained even after an additional 6 months in the normal housing condition (NE-12). (D2) However, animals given weekly cross-modal exposure sessions (VA trained) over the same period showed a significant improvement in RF register. (E, F and G) Bar graphs summarize the average size (diameter) of the visual and auditory RFs in the population, and the t-scores (higher = greater RF misalignment, see text) in the five conditions. Error bars indicate SEM, ns = non-significant. Other conventions are the same as in previous figures.