Table 5. Comparison of the nevus of Ota classification methodology.
Three-point severity scale | Tanino's classification | PUMCH classification | |
---|---|---|---|
Measure of classification | Extent of involvement of the face | Frequency of structure involvement | Patterns of pigmentation in the trigeminal nerve branch distributions, symmetry and complications |
Number of categories | 3 | 7 | 15 |
Rate of coverage (%) | 100 | 64.2 | 91 |
Positives | 1. Convenient and simple way to describe morphology 2. High validity and reproducibility |
1. Popular system that is generally and conventionally used | 1. High rate of coverage 2. Well-designed background 3. Inclusion of combined disease and symmetric features |
Negatives | 1. Weak pathophysiologic background 2. Doesnot account for bilaterality and combined disease 3. No consensus among dermatologists |
1. Low coverage rate in real cases 2. Ambiguous demarcation between subtypes 3. A conventional but imperfect method |
1. Too many categories 2. Does not account for all nevus of Ota patients |