Table III.
Atlanta | Chicago | Dallas | Houston | LA | NYC | Miami | Philadelphia | SF | DC | Χ2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | |||||||||||
All Providers | 41 | 54 | 36 | 44 | 56 | 52 | 41 | 57 | 59 | 39 | |
HIVPs | 14 | 24 | 8 | 7 | 27 | 30 | 25 | 31 | 37 | 21 | |
PCPs | 27 | 30 | 28 | 37 | 29 | 22 | 16 | 26 | 22 | 18 | |
Comfortable with PrEP activities | |||||||||||
All Providers | 68% | 76% | 64% | 55% | 77% | 71% | 73% | 81% | 78% | 87% | 16.88+ |
HIVPs | 86% | 96% | 88% | 71% | 96% | 90% | 84% | 90% | 84% | 91% | 6.70 |
PCPs | 59% | 60% | 57% | 51% | 59% | 46% | 56% | 69% | 69% | 83% | 8.93 |
Heard of PrEP | |||||||||||
All Providers | 76% | 80% | 72% | 71% | 91% | 94% | 85% | 88% | 98% | 95% | 33.84*** |
HIVPs | 93% | 92% | 100% | 86% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 14.18 |
PCPs | 67% | 70% | 64% | 68% | 83% | 86% | 69% | 73% | 96% | 89% | 13.89 |
Familiar with prescribing PrEP | |||||||||||
All Providers | 29% | 50% | 28% | 27% | 59% | 69% | 44% | 54% | 64% | 62% | 40.74*** |
HIVPs | 57% | 79% | 75% | 29% | 93% | 80% | 64% | 81% | 78% | 76% | 18.24* |
PCPs | 15% | 27% | 14% | 27% | 28% | 55% | 13% | 23% | 41% | 44% | 19.19* |
Ever discussed PrEP | |||||||||||
All Providers | 37% | 52% | 33% | 43% | 70% | 79% | 56% | 56% | 73% | 77% | 45.27*** |
HIVPs | 64% | 88% | 88% | 71% | 89% | 90% | 84% | 87% | 92% | 100% | 12.71 |
PCPs | 22% | 23% | 18% | 38% | 52% | 64% | 13% | 19% | 41% | 50% | 27.80*** |
Prescribed PrEP | |||||||||||
All Providers | 24% | 33% | 33% | 18% | 46% | 62% | 29% | 30% | 58% | 54% | 40.85*** |
HIVPs | 50% | 50% | 88% | 57% | 70% | 80% | 44% | 48% | 76% | 86% | 23.37** |
PCPs | 11% | 20% | 18% | 11% | 24% | 36% | 6% | 8% | 27% | 17% | 12.86 |
p < .001
p < .01
p < .05
p = .05
HIVPs and PCPs were compared using chi-square tests. LA = Los Angeles; NYC = New York City; SF = San Francisco; DC = Washington, D.C