Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2017 May;21(5):1256–1267. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1625-1

Table IV.

Perceived Barriers to and Negative Attitudes toward Prescribing PrEP by Provider Type and Prescribing Experience and Willingness Among Non-Prescribers to Engage in PrEP Activities.

HIVPs PCPs

Ever Prescribed Ever Prescribed

Overall
(N=490)
HIVPs
(N=229)
PCPs
(N=261)
B (SE) OR Yes
(N=147)
No
(N=82)
Χ2 OR Yes
(N=46)
No
(N=215)
Χ2 OR
Any barriers to prescribing 83% 75% 90% 1.14 (0.28)*** 3.11 70% 83% 4.60* 2.08 78% 92% 7.82** 3.24
Specific barriers
 Completing prior authorizations 60% 54% 64% 0.34 (0.20) 1.40 50% 61% 2.40 1.54 50% 67% 5.03* 2.07
 Patients’ insurance coverage 57% 56% 59% 0.03 (0.20) 1.03 54% 57% 0.18 1.13 44% 62% 5.57* 2.15
 Knowledge about PrEP 44% 19% 66% 1.96 (0.23)*** 7.12 12% 32% 14.00*** 3.55 33% 73% 26.77*** 5.46
 Time needed to counsel on risk-reduction 39% 25% 51% 1.10 (0.21)*** 3.02 19% 37% 8.56** 2.45 35% 55% 6.13* 2.28
 Other staff’s capacity 32% 20% 43% 1.13 (0.23)*** 3.10 13% 33% 13.12*** 3.31 24% 47% 7.92** 2.77
 Clinical capacity 32% 23% 40% 0.73 (0.22)*** 2.07 15% 38% 15.44*** 3.45 22% 43% 7.34** 2.74
 Follow-up visits for monitoring 30% 20% 38% 0.95 (0.23)*** 2.58 14% 31% 8.61** 2.63 24% 41% 4.90* 2.25
 Provider reimbursement for visits 25% 22% 27% 0.02 (0.23) 1.02 21% 24% 0.33 1.21 15% 30% 4.05* 2.36
 Clinical policies/corporate restrictions 18% 16% 21% 0.28 (0.26) 1.33 10% 27% 11.90*** 3.48 7% 24% 6.83** 4.46
 Willingness to prescribe 16% 10% 21% 0.62 (0.29)* 1.86 6% 17% 6.99** 3.16 7% 24% 6.83** 4.46
 Comfort discussing sexual matters 10% 7% 12% 0.27 (0.35) 1.31 6% 9% 0.47 1.43 2% 14% 5.28* 7.58
 Thoughts about whether PrEP is ethical 8% 8% 8% −0.05 (0.36) 0.95 8% 10% 0.36 1.34 4% 9% 1.21 2.26

Any negative attitudes 54% 45% 61% 0.54 (0.20)** 1.71 40% 55% 5.06* 1.87 46% 64% 5.47* 2.13
Negative attitudes
 People should use condoms instead of PrEP 34% 30% 38% 0.25 (0.28) 1.28 25% 39% 4.80* 1.90 30% 40% 1.33 1.50
 PrEP results in risk compensation 22% 20% 23% 0.28 (0.21) 1.33 17% 24% 1.82 1.57 17% 25% 1.12 1.55
 PrEP will increase resistance 22% 19% 25% 0.17 (0.24) 1.18 15% 26% 3.91* 1.96 22% 26% 0.30 1.24
 PrEP users are not likely to adhere 18% 17% 19% 0.28 (0.25) 1.32 13% 24% 4.90* 2.17 7% 22% 5.76* 4.01
 PrEP is too costly 16% 14% 18% 0.14 (0.27) 1.15 13% 16% 0.38 1.27 11% 19% 1.76 1.93
***

p < .001

**

p < .01

*

p < .05

Provider types were compared using logistic regression, controlling for geographic region and professional position. Prescribers and non-prescribers were compared using chi-square tests.