Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Econ J (London). 2015 Oct 15;127(599):126–142. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12256

Table A1.

Linear and Quadratic Age Effects on the Within-person Change in Life Satisfaction Between Year t and t − 1

BHPS HILDA SOEP MABEL




Coefficient p value Coefficient p value Coefficient p value Coefficient p value
Panel (a): time trend, without controls
Age       0.001 0.000       0.001 0.000       0.001 0.001       0.001  0.077
N 103,159 80,538 185,243 13,910
Panel (b): time trend, socio-economic controls
Age       0.001 0.000       0.002 0.000       0.003 0.000       0.002  0.103
Length of time spent in the panel       0.007 0.017       0.036 0.000       0.021 0.000       0.102  0.119
Length of time spent in the panel2     −0.0002 0.095     −0.002 0.006     −0.001 0.000     –*  –*
N 98,320 80,389 185,169 9,297
Panel (c): time trend, socio-economic controls with age-squared
Age       0.003 0.059       0.017 0.000       0.006 0.000       0.014  0.138
Age-squared     −0.00002 0.263     −0.0002 0.000     −0.00004 0.010     −0.0001  0.196
Length of time spent in the panel       0.066 0.024       0.028 0.001       0.020 0.000       0.099  0.130
Length of time spent in the panel2     −0.0002 0.115     −0.002 0.013     −0.001 0.000     –* *
N 98,320 80,389 185,169 9,297

Notes. Dependent variable: delta life-satisfaction. Ordinary least squares equations with robust standard errors and clustering at the individual level.

*

The squared term for the panel condition variable is omitted because this variable is approximately collinear with the level variable due the short nature of the MABEL panel.

Socio-economic controls are described in the Section 2.