Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2016 May 16;76(12):1120–1129. doi: 10.1002/pros.23200

Table 3.

Performance of strategies for defining lower PCa risk based on FH and GRS for targeted PCa detection in the placebo arm of PCPT

Criteria for lower risk # (%) of subjects PCa High-grade PCa


# of men negative Negative predictive value (NPV) False negative rate # (%) of cases missed # of men negative Negative predictive value (NPV) False negative rate # (%) of cases missed
FH− 3,756(83%) 2876 76.57% 23.43% 880(79.71%) 3583 95.39% 4.61% 173(79.72%)
GRS<0.6 1,076(24%) 894 83.09% 16.91% 182(16.49%) 1036 96.28% 3.72% 40(18.43%)
FH− and GRS<0.6 922(20%) 766 83.08% 16.92% 156(14.13%) 887 96.20% 3.80% 35(16.13%)

PCPT: Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial

PCa: Prostate cancer

FH: Family history

GRS: Genetic risk score

High-grade PCa is defined as PCa with Gleason score ≥7