Table 3.
Associations of Socioeconomic Status in 2010 with Cut-Point Shifts in Self-Rated Health in 2012 among Chinese Adults (18–70 years old; N = 17,877)
| Poor - Fair | Fair - Good | Good - Very Good | Very Good - Excellent | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Ref: 61–70) | ||||||||
| 18–30 | 0.12** | (0.04) | 0.19*** | (0.04) | −0.06 | (0.04) | −0.02 | (0.05) |
| 31–40 | 0.22*** | (0.03) | 0.24*** | (0.04) | 0.03 | (0.03) | 0.06 | (0.04) |
| 41–50 | 0.23*** | (0.03) | 0.23*** | (0.04) | 0.07 | (0.03) | 0.02 | (0.04) |
| 51–60 | 0.14*** | (0.03) | 0.13*** | (0.03) | 0.07* | (0.03) | 0.05 | (0.04) |
| Male (Ref: female) | 0.13*** | (0.02) | 0.12*** | (0.03) | 0.06** | (0.02) | 0.07* | (0.03) |
| Marital status (Ref: married) | ||||||||
| Single | −0.05 | (0.04) | −0.12** | (0.04) | −0.09* | (0.04) | −0.04 | (0.04) |
| Divorced/Widowed | 0.11** | (0.04) | 0.12** | (0.05) | 0.08 | (0.04) | 0.02 | (0.05) |
| Education (Ref: none) | ||||||||
| Primary school | 0.03 | (0.03) | 0.14*** | (0.03) | 0.12*** | (0.03) | 0.04 | (0.03) |
| Junior high school | 0.03 | (0.03) | 0.14*** | (0.04) | 0.25*** | (0.03) | 0.18*** | (0.04) |
| Senior high school or above | −0.10* | (0.04) | 0.00 | (0.05) | 0.23*** | (0.04) | 0.17** | (0.05) |
| Verbal test | 0.00* | (0.00) | −0.01*** | (0.00) | 0.00** | (0.00) | 0.00 | (0.00) |
| Annual family income per capita (logged) | −0.02 | (0.01) | −0.02 | (0.01) | 0.01 | (0.01) | 0.01 | (0.01) |
| Family wealth (percentile scaled to 0–1) | 0.04 | (0.04) | 0.17*** | (0.04) | 0.11** | (0.04) | 0.10* | (0.05) |
| Family cadre/party member (Ref: no) | −0.03 | (0.02) | −0.03 | (0.02) | −0.01 | (0.02) | −0.04 | (0.03) |
| Urban (Ref: rural) | −0.06** | (0.02) | 0.02 | (0.02) | 0.04 | (0.02) | 0.05 | (0.03) |
| Smoking (Ref: no) | 0.01 | (0.02) | −0.03 | (0.03) | 0.02 | (0.03) | −0.02 | (0.03) |
| Drinking alcohol (Ref: no) | 0.02 | (0.03) | 0.06* | (0.03) | 0.02 | (0.03) | 0.04 | (0.03) |
| Physical exercise (Ref: no) | −0.03 | (0.02) | −0.04 | (0.02) | 0.02 | (0.02) | −0.01 | (0.03) |
| County GDP per capita (logged) | −0.03* | (0.01) | 0.02 | (0.01) | 0.01 | (0.01) | 0.01 | (0.01) |
| Constant | −2.23*** | (0.13) | −2.06*** | (0.14) | −1.08*** | (0.13) | 0.11 | (0.15) |
Notes: Ref = reference. Longitudinal lost-to-follow-up is adjusted by inverse probability weighting. Robust standard errors that adjust for individuals clustered within families are shown in parentheses.
*
p < 0.05;
**
p < 0.01;
***
p < 0.001.